Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed?

[avada]

Hi!

So JPEG-XL support was removed from Centbrowser as well. Can't it be re-added the same way Thorium did?

[Admini]

Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comp...index.html)
Where do you need to display images in this format?

[avada]

Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comp...index.html)
Where do you need to display images in this format?

Well, outside google everyone seems to prefer it. And it's an open upcoming standardized format, so it could be used on any website.

I was merely interested from CentBrowser's end. Google for whatever political reason removed it for the time being. Everyone panned the decision.
But Thorium and maybe chose to keep JXL support.