+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Bugs & Suggestions (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? (/showthread.php?tid=7865)
Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - avada - 07-25-2024
Hi!
So JPEG-XL support was removed from Centbrowser as well. Can't it be re-added the same way Thorium did?
RE: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - Admini - 07-26-2024
Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html)
Where do you need to display images in this format?
RE: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - avada - 07-26-2024
(07-26-2024, 06:42 AM)Admini Wrote: Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html)Well, outside google everyone seems to prefer it. And it's an open upcoming standardized format, so it could be used on any website.
Where do you need to display images in this format?
I was merely interested from CentBrowser's end. Google for whatever political reason removed it for the time being. Everyone panned the decision.
But Thorium and maybe chose to keep JXL support.