![]() |
Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - Printable Version +- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en) +-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Bugs & Suggestions (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? (/showthread.php?tid=7865) |
Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - avada - 07-25-2024 Hi! So JPEG-XL support was removed from Centbrowser as well. Can't it be re-added the same way Thorium did? RE: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - Admini - 07-26-2024 Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html) Where do you need to display images in this format? RE: Was JPEG-XL support let go? Couldn't Thorium's path be followed? - avada - 07-26-2024 (07-26-2024, 06:42 AM)Admini Wrote: Seems they prefer AVIF to JPEG-XL. (https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html)Well, outside google everyone seems to prefer it. And it's an open upcoming standardized format, so it could be used on any website. I was merely interested from CentBrowser's end. Google for whatever political reason removed it for the time being. Everyone panned the decision. But Thorium and maybe chose to keep JXL support. |