+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released (/showthread.php?tid=1635)
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - MorviCool - 08-26-2017
Здравствуйте!
Могли бы в настройках перенести ПОЛНОЕ отключение Flash player.
Блокировка Flash не помогает, и утечка ip все равно работает.
_____________
Hello!
FULL disconnect Flash player.
Flash blocking does not help, and the ip leak still works.
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - ChromiumIQ - 08-27-2017
Hello!
I have such question. Why version x32 quicker x64?. I delivered both with a net profile, Win7. It is more difficult to compile a code perhaps on x64.
![[Image: 9a419d0e8a04t.jpg]](http://s018.radikal.ru/i505/1708/e3/9a419d0e8a04t.jpg)
![[Image: 29445ce686e8t.jpg]](http://s018.radikal.ru/i521/1708/e3/29445ce686e8t.jpg)
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - Ozzy666 - 08-27-2017
Runs / Minute
99.52
± 0.73
Test Again on cent browser 60 x64 on windows 10 pro 64bit on 1 TB SAMSUNG 850 EVO drive with a core i7 4790k on 32 gb of 1600 g.skillz ram and i ran it on browserbench.org
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - ChromiumIQ - 08-27-2017
(08-27-2017, 09:13 AM)Ozzy666 Wrote: Runs / MinuteIt is necessary to compare results at itself for 32 and 64, but not to my results. Take portable versions 32 and 64.
99.52
± 0.73
Test Again on cent browser 60 x64 on windows 10 pro 64bit on 1 TB SAMSUNG 850 EVO drive with a core i7 4790k on 32 gb of 1600 g.skillz ram and i ran it on browserbench.org
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - Ozzy666 - 08-27-2017
you have to take into consideration my operating system is newer than your and my hardware is probably newer as well and chromium works better on newer hardware i noticed a huge difference on chrome compared to it on direct x 11 compared t it on direct x 12 performance and everything
and that i also never run portable app version's of a browser what are you doing treating your computer like it is a phone
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - ChromiumIQ - 08-27-2017
(08-27-2017, 05:30 PM)Ozzy666 Wrote: you have to take into consideration my operating system is newer than your and my hardware is probably newer as well and chromium works better on newer hardware i noticed a huge difference on chrome compared to it on direct x 11 compared t it on direct x 12 performance and everythingOnce again. Establish at yourself at first the version of 32 bits, remove result, then remove it and establish 64 bits, remove result and compare them. Draw a conclusion. It isn't necessary to compare to my results. They are received on the old personal computer. Core 2 Duo E7500 @ 4,2 GHz, DDR 2 8GB. Your result has to be not 10% more, and much more. Yours 10 not quicker 7. A result - at you the system isn't really good.
and that i also never run portable app version's of a browser what are you doing treating your computer like it is a phone
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - Petrovic - 08-28-2017
Cent Browser 2.8.5.75 Final
x86
http://static.centbrowser.com/installer_32/centbrowser_2.8.5.75.exe
portable
http://static.centbrowser.com/installer_32/centbrowser_2.8.5.75_portable.exe
x64
http://static.centbrowser.com/installer_64/centbrowser_2.8.5.75_x64.exe
portable
http://static.centbrowser.com/installer_64/centbrowser_2.8.5.75_x64_portable.exe
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - mabay - 09-18-2017
Can you make just clear "new tab" without "enter to cent browser"?
Thank you!
RE: Cent Browser 2.8.3.58(for Windows) Released - Admini - 09-18-2017
(09-18-2017, 11:41 AM)mabay Wrote: Can you make just clear "new tab" without "enter to cent browser"?
Thank you!
Are you referring to the text "Not signed in to Cent Browser" in the top right corner?