Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 4.2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
STABLE version -- 5.1.1130.129
#51
(04-24-2024, 11:17 AM)New Line Wrote: I agree. I thought I was the only one with this problem.I also have a new stable version (5.1.1130.82) installed  that works much slower (sites open very slowly), all old versions of the browser with the same profile work much faster, I don't know what this is related to.
Install the Page load time extension. Download the page from the web in different browser versions, find out the download time. Compare the results with each other. To confirm your words, post screenshots with the results. But so far there is no evidence. The usual chatter. I don't have slow operation in the latest version of the browser.
Reply
#52
(04-24-2024, 11:44 AM)Bolt Wrote: But so far there is no evidence.
So far, for comparison, I have found a long opening of pages on an x32 bit system. On x64, all sites open instantly.
Reply
#53
(04-24-2024, 12:46 PM)Den888 Wrote: So far, for comparison, I have found a long opening of pages on an x32 bit system. On x64, all sites open instantly.
I have all the applications x64.
Reply
#54
(04-24-2024, 01:10 AM)moitinhdaukiss Wrote: Version 5.1.1130.82 seems to have a very slow speed when surfing the web. I have tested older versions of Centbrowser with very stable results. Is there a problem with the new version?

Currently I'm still using your old beta version that just released.
Have you testing disabling your anti-virus temporarily?
Especially if it is ESET NOD32.
Reply
#55
(04-23-2024, 04:05 PM)Spuner Wrote: I know about this key. But it doesn't work properly...
There should be no problem. You need to confirm that the command line is added correctly.
--disable-features=GlobalMediaControls
Reply
#56
(04-23-2024, 06:07 AM)piliq Wrote: There are a lot of folders "chrome_BITS_..." with one file .puff (2-4 KB) in 'c:\program files' and system TEMP folder. What files and folders are these? Windows 7 64-bit.
Have you checked their creation time?
They are used for components upgrade by Chromium.
They should be created by the beta version, 'c:\program files' is not used any more in stable version.
Reply
#57
(04-23-2024, 05:53 PM)piliq Wrote: Problem still there... Any solutios?
Are you using 64-bit browser?
Reply
#58
(04-25-2024, 06:39 AM)Admin Wrote: Have you checked their creation time?
They are used for components upgrade by Chromium.
They should be created by the beta version, 'c:\program files' is not used any more in stable version.
Yes. They were "fresh". I simply deleted them and disabled BITS service in Windows 7, and they are no more and no new folders. Smile But, there are still new "chrome_url_fetcher_..." folders in TEMP folder. Not a problem at all.

(04-25-2024, 06:40 AM)Admin Wrote: Are you using 64-bit browser?
Yes. I'm using now Version 5.1.1130.82 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable). Previous version was 5.0.1002.295 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable) and it works fine with Mega. No need in their App. I have to use Opera v95.0.4635.84 to work with Mega. Waiting for new version of Cent to use only one browser  Wink
Reply
#59
(04-25-2024, 02:49 PM)piliq Wrote: Yes. They were "fresh". I simply deleted them and disabled BITS service in Windows 7, and they are no more and no new folders. Smile But, there are still new "chrome_url_fetcher_..." folders in TEMP folder. Not a problem at all.

Yes. I'm using now Version 5.1.1130.82 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable). Previous version was 5.0.1002.295 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable) and it works fine with Mega. No need in their App. I have to use Opera v95.0.4635.84 to work with Mega. Waiting for new version of Cent to use only one browser  Wink
Does Chrome 124 work normally with Mega?
Reply
#60
(04-25-2024, 04:42 PM)Admin Wrote: Does Chrome 124 work normally with Mega?
I don't know. Never tried.

UPD
Just tried it on Catsxp 4.4.7 Kernel: 124.0.6367.66 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Succesfully uploaded 4,03 GB file by site on Mega.nz.
Can anyone reproduce this issue? Please.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 173 Guest(s)