STABLE version -- 4.2.10.171

[Admini]

Even the Windows version cannot be determined? This was in the younger versions of the browser.
And please explain what this actually means:
1. Version - ca97ba107095b2a88cf04f9135463301e685cbb0-refs / branch-heads / 3538 @ {# 1094}?
2. Options - d74ef32b-c7113149?
What do these sets of numbers stand for?

1 is tag information in Git repository.
2 is Chromium field trial parameters.

[cb-user]

1 is tag information in Git repository.
2 is Chromium field trial parameters.

1. Why information about tags on GitHub is not available in all browser versions?
2. Why is the Windows version not defined correctly in all browser versions?
3. Why are the chromium field trial parameters not available in all browser versions?

[xghoster]

Hi. Are there any updates about the next release date?

[Journeyover]

Hi. Are there any updates about the next release date?

Even if they say anything about a release date, it's extremely hard to believe as every month they have said that the update would come has been completely false. Honestly you might as well look into a different browser as you have a better chance of finding one that is up to date and will stay updated better than this browser.

[cb-user]

And yet again a question for the developer:

Why not just close the holes and vulnerabilities with security patches in time without switching to another kernel? How the 360 Extreme Explorer developers do it. At the same time, bring one of the best and most problem-free Chromium engine to perfection.
Why can't you follow this path?

Why is this constant race for the numbers of new versions?!!

[ttomomo]

And yet again a question for the developer:

Why not just close the holes and vulnerabilities with security patches in time without switching to another kernel? How the 360 Extreme Explorer developers do it. At the same time, bring one of the best and most problem-free Chromium engine to perfection.
Why can't you follow this path?

Why is this constant race for the numbers of new versions?!!

I totally agree with cb-user.
A chromium-based browser doesn't mean it must be based on the NEWEST chromium.

[gtanadam]

That 360 browser is too bloated.. but compared to Cent Browser, that beta based on chromium 86 was so darn fast. the #disable-direct-write worked perfectly fine with MacType.
I'm not far from having #disable-direct-write fully implemented, by the way.

[cb-user]

360 Extreme Explorer is a very good browser. The only thing is that there are a lot of hieroglyphs right in the code. And a lot of unnecessary services and telemetry. But all this can be removed by hand. But the browser is very advanced. The developers are just as good at working on the kernel as the author of Center Browser.
But they also do not fulfill the wishes of users. They have their own development strategy.

[rch]

But they also do not fulfill the wishes of users. They have their own development strategy.

It would be interesting to know from the devs if the two main problems causing the delays to Cent are there because they themselves insist those options have to stay or they are trying to keep them because of user requests/feedback.

[cb-user]

Question to the developer.
Why is file - elevation_service.exe - present in some versions of Center Browser but not in other versions? Why is this happening? What is he responsible for in the browser?