STABLE version -- 5.1.1130.129

[Bolt]

I agree. I thought I was the only one with this problem.I also have a new stable version (5.1.1130.82) installed  that works much slower (sites open very slowly), all old versions of the browser with the same profile work much faster, I don't know what this is related to.

Install the Page load time extension. Download the page from the web in different browser versions, find out the download time. Compare the results with each other. To confirm your words, post screenshots with the results. But so far there is no evidence. The usual chatter. I don't have slow operation in the latest version of the browser.

[Den888]

But so far there is no evidence.

So far, for comparison, I have found a long opening of pages on an x32 bit system. On x64, all sites open instantly.

[Bolt]

So far, for comparison, I have found a long opening of pages on an x32 bit system. On x64, all sites open instantly.

I have all the applications x64.

[Admini]

Version 5.1.1130.82 seems to have a very slow speed when surfing the web. I have tested older versions of Centbrowser with very stable results. Is there a problem with the new version?

Currently I'm still using your old beta version that just released.

Have you testing disabling your anti-virus temporarily?
Especially if it is ESET NOD32.

[Admini]

I know about this key. But it doesn't work properly...

There should be no problem. You need to confirm that the command line is added correctly.
--disable-features=GlobalMediaControls

[Admini]

There are a lot of folders "chrome_BITS_..." with one file .puff (2-4 KB) in 'c:\program files' and system TEMP folder. What files and folders are these? Windows 7 64-bit.

Have you checked their creation time?
They are used for components upgrade by Chromium.
They should be created by the beta version, 'c:\program files' is not used any more in stable version.

[Admini]

Problem still there... Any solutios?

Are you using 64-bit browser?

[piliq]

Have you checked their creation time?
They are used for components upgrade by Chromium.
They should be created by the beta version, 'c:\program files' is not used any more in stable version.

Yes. They were "fresh". I simply deleted them and disabled BITS service in Windows 7, and they are no more and no new folders.  But, there are still new "chrome_url_fetcher_..." folders in TEMP folder. Not a problem at all.

Are you using 64-bit browser?

Yes. I'm using now Version 5.1.1130.82 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable). Previous version was 5.0.1002.295 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable) and it works fine with Mega. No need in their App. I have to use Opera v95.0.4635.84 to work with Mega. Waiting for new version of Cent to use only one browser 

[Admini]

Yes. They were "fresh". I simply deleted them and disabled BITS service in Windows 7, and they are no more and no new folders.  But, there are still new "chrome_url_fetcher_..." folders in TEMP folder. Not a problem at all.

Yes. I'm using now Version 5.1.1130.82 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable). Previous version was 5.0.1002.295 (Official Build) (64-bit) (Portable) and it works fine with Mega. No need in their App. I have to use Opera v95.0.4635.84 to work with Mega. Waiting for new version of Cent to use only one browser 

Does Chrome 124 work normally with Mega?

[piliq]

Does Chrome 124 work normally with Mega?

I don't know. Never tried.

UPD
Just tried it on Catsxp 4.4.7 Kernel: 124.0.6367.66 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Succesfully uploaded 4,03 GB file by site on Mega.nz.
Can anyone reproduce this issue? Please.