STABLE version -- 5.1.1130.129

[FeNoZiPaM]

Я прошу прощения, а чего ты добиваешься?

Я великодушно прощаю вас! Я этого и добивался - открыл ваш замыленный глаз, вернул в реальность из мира грёз! Возможно, у вас даже появится личная жизнь теперь. И никогда больше не занижайте реакты пользователям. В противном случае, вас ждёт неминуемый бан. Будьте терпимее как к разработчик, так и к пользователям форума. Только ваши родители в ответе за ваше хамское воспитание и неумение вести себя в обществе. Это сообщение, к слову, не требует вашего ответа. Не пишите мне, пжст - у меня нет желания общаться с откровенным быдлом.

[QZMTCH]

Я великодушно прощаю вас! Я этого и добивался - открыл ваш замыленный глаз, вернул в реальность из мира грёз! Возможно, у вас даже появится личная жизнь теперь. И никогда больше не занижайте реакты пользователям. В противном случае, вас ждёт неминуемый бан. Будьте терпимее как к разработчик, так и к пользователям форума. Только ваши родители в ответе за ваше хамское воспитание и неумение вести себя в обществе. Это сообщение, к слову, не требует вашего ответа. Не пишите мне, пжст - у меня нет желания общаться с откровенным быдлом.

Сам-то понял что написал? 
Я тебя не оскорблял кстати, в отличии от тебя.

[molio]

Kinza released its patches that it used, there is, for example, RSS, but no one adds these functions to their browser (I would not refuse an RSS reader in cent browser, so as not to use various extensions) 
By the way, here's the patch if anyone needs it https://www.upload.ee/files/17642666/kin...h.zip.html

I assume you are trying to say that if you publish the source code, no one will use it.
I want the source code made public, you don't want it, and that's all there is to it.

I do not think it is appropriate to give the example of Kinza.
First of all, it could be attributed to the fact that Google probably intentionally makes Chrome and Chromium significantly more difficult to modifiy (and makes it more difficult with each version upgrade, removing a lot of the old UI code, etc.).
It is also very difficult to create a browser from scratch from the Blink engine (well, this is true for all browsers except IE and the Trident engine, but webkit2 is still better, a good example being chrome, which was created by forking webkit).
I think Vivaldi is trying very hard, but still buggy.
Kinza is also a case in point, it was baby carriage until the end of the day, and just patching to the latest version of Chrome does not create the latest Kinza.

You have to look at Floorp, which is now firefox based, because They've been so disappointed with the moddability of Chrome.https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp
It is active on GitHub and despite being created by a small group of high school students, it is very active.
I think Cent falls into this category.
Cent should have minimal modifications and a team of 3 developers max.
Therefore, it is more likely that someone will come up with a follow-up compared to Kinza.

I don't know if they can be rivals, but some of them feel threatened by Chrome and have started to create a new rendering engine.https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird
https://github.com/gosub-io/gosub-engine

I don't think they can beat goolgle and Apple, but I can't say there is no possibility that MS and Mask won't switch to them among the big tech MATANAs.

[QZMTCH]

I assume you are trying to say that if you publish the source code, no one will use it.
I want the source code made public, you don't want it, and that's all there is to it.

No, I want the source code to be open. I just don't see anyone ever supporting the development further.

You have to look at Floorp, which is now firefox based, because They've been so disappointed with the moddability of Chrome.https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp
It is active on GitHub and despite being created by a small group of high school students, it is very active.

I tried Floorp, but it doesn't even start normally for me, unlike Firefox
and I can't say anything about their work, but it seems to me that they are still far from Firefox

[Tracker35]

I hope that if a new version comes out, it contains an " ExtensionManifestV2Availability = 2 " by default
chrome://policy/

[Admini]

I hope that if a new version comes out, it contains an " ExtensionManifestV2Availability = 2 " by default
chrome://policy/

Yes, we intend to do that.

[Sneisi]

Yes, we intend to do that.

Manifest V3 and the Future of uBlock Origin
ublockorigin.com.


uBlock Origin is a wide-spectrum content blocker with CPU and memory efficiency as a primary feature.

Manifest V3 is a significant update to the Chrome Extension platform manifest, introducing changes that impact how extensions interact with web content. One of the most significant changes is the modification of the webRequest API, which many content blockers use to intercept and modify network requests. uBlock Origin relies heavily on the webRequest API to block unwanted content before it loads, but under MV3 the webRequest API is limited. Under MV3 extensions are encouraged to use the new declarativeNetRequest API instead, but it lacks some of the dynamic capabilities that uBlock Origin utilizes for advanced content blocking.

Some publishers of Chromium based browsers have promised their MV2 support:
• Vivaldi promises to support Manifest V2 until June 2025.
• MV2 extensions will still work in Brave. 

In June 2025, Google plans to remove all remaining Manifest V2 items from the Chrome Web Store. It can be handy to save CRX extensions from the Chrome Web Store with the CRX Extractor/Downloader.

If the migration from MV2 to MV3 can no longer be bypassed in Chromium-based browsers, I'll consider to turn back to a Firefox-based browser as my main browser. 

Browsers that are committed to MV2 support are a high priority for me and are at the top of my list. What can users expect from CentBrowser?

Will the next version of CentBrowser be updated with MV2 support?

[FeNoZiPaM]

Will the next version of CentBrowser be updated with MV2 support?

you're asking a question about your answer) you're in the matrix, man.

[molio]

No, I want the source code to be open. I just don't see anyone ever supporting the development further.

I tried Floorp, but it doesn't even start normally for me, unlike Firefox
and I can't say anything about their work, but it seems to me that they are still far from Firefox

Is that so?
In any case, I would like the features listed below, and I am truly fed up with Chrome's lack of even those hidden settings.
Therefore, I would like Cent to continue as long as Chrome is in the position of the browser with the largest market share, and in case they decide to give up the development, I would like them to decide to publish the source code.

1. Force links to open in the background tab
   
2. Open popup window in tab
   
3. Hide close button on tab
   
4. Pinned tabs can only be closed by context menu
   
5. Warn me when closing window with multiple tabs
   
6. Minimum tab width(px)
   
7. Open hyperlink in / Open bookmarks in / Open homepage in / Open search result in / Open typed URL in new tab
   
8. New tab position Next to current tab group
   
9. Action after closing current tab Auto colect
   
10. the multi-column tab list button
    Always open tabs in the background(not middle click, Ctrl+click)By only left click is absolutely mandatory!
    
    Display of search results            >New foreground tab
    Display when typing a URL        >New background tab
    New tab position                      >After the current tab group
    when current tab is closed          >Automatic selection
    When closing the last tab          >insert a new tab without changing the window
    
11. • "open in new tab", "background, foreground selection", etc.
      
    • the multi-column tab list button
      
    • Restore button for closed tabs
      
    • Download button and download list
      
    • Mute toggle button
      
    • Screenshot button
      
    • Always open tabs in the background
      
    • Super Drag
      
    • Enable lazy loading of the session at startup
      
    • These behavior choices are essential to me.Minimum tab width, tab list menu, download list manager, always open in background, location of new tabs, behavior when closing, etc.
      
      
    
    
    
12. Show home page                      >New foreground tab
    Display of search results            >New foreground tab
    Display when typing a URL        >New background tab
    New tab position                      >After the current tab group
    when current tab is closed          >Automatic selection
    When closing the last tab          >insert a new tab without changing the window
    Middle click on tab                    >Reload tab
    Click middle button on tab bar    >Restore last closed tab
    

Please do not worry about duplication.
I'm too lazy to count them.


After reading the source code, if it is possible for me to add these features, I would like to just do the work, and if it is difficult, I will give money to a competent acquaintance / friend to do it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Floorp works almost as well as firefox in my environment. It is a portable version, though.
There are also numerous reports of it working fine.
I think you may have tried a newer version.

Try the stable version from last summer. Or, if you can provide a clean install of Windows, try using it on that.

Now, then, how about another Zen browser?
This is a browser inspired by the Arc browser. Or rather, They couldn't stand the fact that Arc is based on Chromium, but its source code is not publicly available, and it is almost exclusively for Mac users, so They tried to implement Arc's features in own.
https://github.com/zen-browser/desktop

The Arc browser has recently stopped development. The reason is that its market share did not grow as much as the developers expected. Then, they launched a new browser called Dia. It seems that many users are disappointed.

[Admini]

Manifest V3 and the Future of uBlock Origin
ublockorigin.com.


uBlock Origin is a wide-spectrum content blocker with CPU and memory efficiency as a primary feature.

Manifest V3 is a significant update to the Chrome Extension platform manifest, introducing changes that impact how extensions interact with web content. One of the most significant changes is the modification of the webRequest API, which many content blockers use to intercept and modify network requests. uBlock Origin relies heavily on the webRequest API to block unwanted content before it loads, but under MV3 the webRequest API is limited. Under MV3 extensions are encouraged to use the new declarativeNetRequest API instead, but it lacks some of the dynamic capabilities that uBlock Origin utilizes for advanced content blocking.

Some publishers of Chromium based browsers have promised their MV2 support:
• Vivaldi promises to support Manifest V2 until June 2025.
• MV2 extensions will still work in Brave. 

In June 2025, Google plans to remove all remaining Manifest V2 items from the Chrome Web Store. It can be handy to save CRX extensions from the Chrome Web Store with the CRX Extractor/Downloader.

With the arrival of Manifest V3, I consider my preparation to turn back to a Firefox-based browser. If the migration from MV2 to MV3 can no longer be bypassed in Chromium-based browsers, I'll consider to turn back to a Firefox-based browser as my main browser. 

Browsers that are committed to MV2 support are a high priority for me and are at the top of my list. What can users expect from CentBrowser?

Will the next version of CentBrowser be updated with MV2 support?

Before June 2025, it is very convenient to support MV2 by a switch.
After June 2025, Google may delete MV2-related source code from Chromium, at that time we need to evaluate the workload before deciding whether to continue supporting MV2.