Dear "wOxxOm",
Bravo!.. Your capture of this detail is a huge success... It would be great, if you had added a solution proposal to this detail that you mentioned...
So, if Cent developer had written the version number as long (66.0.3359.181) instead of short (66) above, there would not be a problem that the "Video start automatically". It's very interesting that the developer could not think about it.
In the meantime, the Chromium authors create a new version almost every day, and they write 66...171, 172, ... , 181. So, it would be great, if the Cent developer should have based on the Chromium that was produced 181 - 170 = 11 days ago.
However, we were still very likely to encounter the same problem again, because the latest release of Kinza and Opera have the same (long) version number (66.0.3359.170), but one of them is problematic, the other is not.
As a result, I'm sure that you will find a solution to this problem as soon as possible, and that you'll make both Cent developer and users very happy.
Regards,
Bravo!.. Your capture of this detail is a huge success... It would be great, if you had added a solution proposal to this detail that you mentioned...
So, if Cent developer had written the version number as long (66.0.3359.181) instead of short (66) above, there would not be a problem that the "Video start automatically". It's very interesting that the developer could not think about it.
In the meantime, the Chromium authors create a new version almost every day, and they write 66...171, 172, ... , 181. So, it would be great, if the Cent developer should have based on the Chromium that was produced 181 - 170 = 11 days ago.
However, we were still very likely to encounter the same problem again, because the latest release of Kinza and Opera have the same (long) version number (66.0.3359.170), but one of them is problematic, the other is not.
As a result, I'm sure that you will find a solution to this problem as soon as possible, and that you'll make both Cent developer and users very happy.
Regards,