Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50
#3
(10-09-2016, 04:32 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Here as we tested, the difference of memory consumption between 2.0 and 2.1 is less than 5%.
Have you changed any options or flags(e.g.:chrome://flags/#disable-direct-write)?
You may compare 2.0 and 2.1 with empty profiles(or run by safemode.bat).

Thanks for the quick reply! I will do further testing and post the results. I haven't tried testing the different builds in safe mode, so the problem may be one of my extensions or corrupt preferences.

Thanks again!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by MikeyNYC - 10-08-2016, 04:07 AM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Admini - 10-09-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by MikeyNYC - 10-09-2016, 07:57 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Journeyover - 10-11-2016, 09:19 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Admini - 10-12-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Journeyover - 10-12-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Admini - 10-13-2016, 06:20 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Journeyover - 10-13-2016, 09:33 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Admini - 10-14-2016, 05:51 PM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by MikeyNYC - 10-23-2016, 06:05 AM
RE: Memory Usage in 2.1.9.50 - by Admini - 10-23-2016, 03:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)