Технические проблемы

[Admini]

Very sorry. This is very silly and inconvenient. Broke everything for Mac users...   

There is nothing you can do to return it to how it was in the old versions?

OK, we will consider changing it back.

[adrem85]

OK, we will consider changing it back.

Thank you very much, I will hope so. This bug is the only reason why I stay on the old version of the browser.

[user00]

1. In the "Super drag" function in the settings for one of the actions, I made a "download from a link". Now the error "Error: Forbidden" sometimes began to appear when saving images, while the usual saving via the context menu works. In this case, the file resolution is shown incorrect (txt, htm). The bug is repeated only when you open an image in a new tab. But not all sites.

This was not the case before, this is a fresh bug.

2. Gestures for image search would also be helpful. The "search/open in new tab" function searches for text but opens images. And I would like to be able to download only images and/or videos in addition to "saving by link" (by the way, the function does not work on video). Now this function can also download entire links (in htm), which is rather strange.

[Admini]

1. In the "Super drag" function in the settings for one of the actions, I made a "download from a link". Now the error "Error: Forbidden" sometimes began to appear when saving images, while the usual saving via the context menu works. In this case, the file resolution is shown incorrect (txt, htm). The bug is repeated only when you open an image in a new tab. But not all sites.

This was not the case before, this is a fresh bug.

2. Gestures for image search would also be helpful. The "search/open in new tab" function searches for text but opens images. And I would like to be able to download only images and/or videos in addition to "saving by link" (by the way, the function does not work on video). Now this function can also download entire links (in htm), which is rather strange.

Thanks for your feedback.
1. We will try to reproduce this issue.
2. If you want to download images and videos only, you need to install some extension with resource filter feature. Or you can install IDM and use context menu item "Download all links with IDM". There is file format filter in the download dialog.

[user00]

2. If you want to download images and videos only, you need to install some extension with resource filter feature. Or you can install IDM and use context menu item "Download all links with IDM". There is file format filter in the download dialog.

You did not understand me... 
Here I was still talking about the "Super drag" function. Turn on one of the "download from link" gestures and try to save the image first, then the video, and then the link. The image will be saved, it will not react to the video, but the link will be saved as an htm file. And I would like to be able to save videos with this gesture, but not links, which is pointless. And sometimes there are false positives when the html element of the link is located over the image that you are trying to save and as a result the htm file is saved.

The same goes for "search/open in new tab". This is also part of "Super drag" that works strangely. The text is searched for in Google, and the pictures are simply opened in the next tab. I would like to search for pictures using this gesture. Maybe make separate "open in new tab" and "search in new tab", which will also search for images through a search engine?

[dascratch]

You did not understand me... 
Here I was still talking about the "Super drag" function. Turn on one of the "download from link" gestures and try to save the image first, then the video, and then the link. The image will be saved, it will not react to the video, but the link will be saved as an htm file. And I would like to be able to save videos with this gesture, but not links, which is pointless. And sometimes there are false positives when the html element of the link is located over the image that you are trying to save and as a result the htm file is saved.

The same goes for "search/open in new tab". This is also part of "Super drag" that works strangely. The text is searched for in Google, and the pictures are simply opened in the next tab. I would like to search for pictures using this gesture. Maybe make separate "open in new tab" and "search in new tab", which will also search for images through a search engine?

Разработка таких функций - сильно трудоёмкий процесс. Каждый сайт волен давать ссылки как ему вздумается и зачастую даже прятать в скрипты. Никто не будет этим заниматься, забудь. Ищи варианты скачивания в сторонних расширениях, узнавай у других пользователей - под каждый сайт или группы сайтов, пилятся отдельные вспомогательные расширения или программы.

[user00]

Разработка таких функций - сильно трудоёмкий процесс. Каждый сайт волен давать ссылки как ему вздумается и зачастую даже прятать в скрипты. Никто не будет этим заниматься, забудь. Ищи варианты скачивания в сторонних расширениях, узнавай у других пользователей - под каждый сайт или группы сайтов, пилятся отдельные вспомогательные расширения или программы.

Функция скачивания уже реализована, но она не действует на видео-файлы в принципе. Я прекрасно знаю про способы спрятать прямую ссылку на видео, но Цент не может скачать жестом mp4-файл, открытый в новой вкладке. А jpg-файл может. Проблема для меня только в этом, мне не очень удобно качать картинки жестом, а видео - комбинацией клавиш или через контекстное меню. Я же не говорю, что он должен уметь m3u8-файлы в один компилировать или ещё что, я именно про прямые ссылки на файлы говорю. Чтобы браузер мог качать со страницы как это (а он уже может):
<img src="https://*****.jpg">
Так и это (пока не может):
<video src="https://*****.mp4">

А, ну и чтобы жест не действовал на ссылки <a href="*****">. Не могу представить ситуации, чтобы кому-то потребовалось качать страницы (точнее, страницы с определенной страницы!!) жестом, да еще и на постоянной основе.

Но вообще, да, простите, не всегда получается четко сформулировать свои желания неадекватного перфекциониста.

UPD: Ну и кстати говоря, функция скачивания видео уже есть в Центе, лол:

Пусть и не в том виде, который ты ожидаешь.

[Admini]

You did not understand me... 
Here I was still talking about the "Super drag" function. Turn on one of the "download from link" gestures and try to save the image first, then the video, and then the link. The image will be saved, it will not react to the video, but the link will be saved as an htm file. And I would like to be able to save videos with this gesture, but not links, which is pointless. And sometimes there are false positives when the html element of the link is located over the image that you are trying to save and as a result the htm file is saved.

The same goes for "search/open in new tab". This is also part of "Super drag" that works strangely. The text is searched for in Google, and the pictures are simply opened in the next tab. I would like to search for pictures using this gesture. Maybe make separate "open in new tab" and "search in new tab", which will also search for images through a search engine?

The things may be complicated.
Some images are embedded inside a link, should we search/open for the image or the link?
For Super Drag we tend to perform common actions, yet searching for an image is not so frequently used.
For downloading videos, things are more complicated. we will add a standalone feature to do that.

[user00]

Some images are embedded inside a link, should we search/open for the image or the link?

Hmm... "Search" and "open" should be separated, I think. Need to "open" links. And "search" is already a picture, because there is no point in looking for a link in a search engine. Also need to "download" a picture, not a link.

Maybe it’s better then to do this:
1. Search for text/image.
2. Open link/image/video.
3. Download the image/video.
4? Download the link. If these are REALLY AT LEAST SOMEONE uses. 
(1 and 2 with "in autonomous/active/background tab", of course, as it is now)

True, there really is a problem with the video - almost all links are indirect. Many users will consider this a bug... But, however, I would still like to be able to download simple videos (like <video src="https://*****.mp4">) via Super Drag. ^_^

For Super Drag we tend to perform common actions, yet searching for an image is not so frequently used.

Is "downloading a link" a regular activity? O_o
Downloading images is regular, this is understandable, but <a>-links... I've never used it.

I do image searches almost as often as downloads, because I almost always search for a picture in the maximum resolution. And by the way, if there were no image search from Yandex, only Google, then I would not use search so often. They have a much more accurate search, ESPECIALLY looking for similar images.

For downloading videos, things are more complicated. we will add a standalone feature to do that.

I will wait! Thanks.

[Admini]

Hmm... "Search" and "open" should be separated, I think. Need to "open" links. And "search" is already a picture, because there is no point in looking for a link in a search engine. Also need to "download" a picture, not a link.

Maybe it’s better then to do this:
1. Search for text/image.
2. Open link/image/video.
3. Download the image/video.
4? Download the link. If these are REALLY AT LEAST SOMEONE uses. 
(1 and 2 with "in autonomous/active/background tab", of course, as it is now)

True, there really is a problem with the video - almost all links are indirect. Many users will consider this a bug... But, however, I would still like to be able to download simple videos (like <video src="https://*****.mp4">) via Super Drag. ^_^

Is "downloading a link" a regular activity? O_o
Downloading images is regular, this is understandable, but <a>-links... I've never used it.

I do image searches almost as often as downloads, because I almost always search for a picture in the maximum resolution. And by the way, if there were no image search from Yandex, only Google, then I would not use search so often. They have a much more accurate search, ESPECIALLY looking for similar images.

I will wait! Thanks.

You are reasonable.
We will consider refactoring this feature.