Posts: 182
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2017
Hi!
In the latests version there are considerable errors about which users report.
There is a sentence before allowing release to issue the beta version. Users will test, will specify errors, you pay attention to them and remove. At your browser many admirers also I think that they will help with his testing. You should not have given release with errors of the Direct Write function. The reputation reached with great difficulty decreases.
We will wish to make successfully correction of mistakes, further development of the browser, to upset as seldom as possible with errors of users of your fine browser. Good luck.
Posts: 224
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
27
02-16-2018, 02:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2018, 02:40 PM by badablek.)
you don't make any error ? You're perfect ? Then probably a robot ?
come on, this is the first time it occurs, and it only affects random users.
you should just be thankful to their work, they do not ow you (or anybody) anything.
stop acting like a manager you are not. Centbrowser team knows its job, but can't test it on every computer in the world and in every setup of every user. Even Intel or Microsoft makes errors (meltdown / spectre patches ?) with products that are SOLD. CentBrowser is given to us FOR FREE.
my 2 cent in this useless thread. Nothing more to say.
ps : you want fast releases, which is totally INCOMPATIBLE with bug free software ! There is one new version of Chrome/Chromium near every day, deep beta testing is not possible.
Posts: 182
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2017
(02-16-2018, 02:37 PM)badablek Wrote: you don't make any error ? You're perfect ? Then probably a robot ?
come on, this is the first time it occurs, and it only affects random users.
you should just be thankful to their work, they do not ow you (or anybody) anything.
stop acting like a manager you are not. Centbrowser team knows its job, but can't test it on every computer in the world and in every setup of every user. Even Intel or Microsoft makes errors (meltdown / spectre patches ?) with products that are SOLD. CentBrowser is given to us FOR FREE.
my 2 cent in this useless thread. Nothing more to say.
ps : you want fast releases, which is totally INCOMPATIBLE with bug free software ! There is one new version of Chrome/Chromium near every day, deep beta testing is not possible. Offer the voluntary help in free testing of the browser, and you refuse taking into account that team of only three people. Ridiculously. You lower the arrogance. I will be grateful for the version without large mistakes, and isn't obliged to be grateful for the version with mistakes which prevent normal work. I agree, developers are obliged by nothing to the user, you only forget that users aren't obliged to use Cent, the choice is. It wasn't pleasant, I have changed for another without problems.
In Russia many users call the Chinese browsers cheap hand-made articles, and the latest version just gets under this definition.
Sit down and think. Each user the dissatisfied user in the country will give very bad note and this information will be carried further. For whom will developers do the browser if about it there are bad responses and users it won't apply? Development, as well as many other Chinese browsers will die.
Posts: 61
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation:
5
(02-16-2018, 02:37 PM)badablek Wrote: you don't make any error ? You're perfect ? Then probably a robot ?
come on, this is the first time it occurs, and it only affects random users.
you should just be thankful to their work, they do not ow you (or anybody) anything.
stop acting like a manager you are not. Centbrowser team knows its job, but can't test it on every computer in the world and in every setup of every user. Even Intel or Microsoft makes errors (meltdown / spectre patches ?) with products that are SOLD. CentBrowser is given to us FOR FREE.
my 2 cent in this useless thread. Nothing more to say.
ps : you want fast releases, which is totally INCOMPATIBLE with bug free software ! There is one new version of Chrome/Chromium near every day, deep beta testing is not possible.
Why such a haughty tone? For a super moderator, you are too unsustainable and render a poor service to the promotion of Cent. This is not a school, and you are not a teacher at all, moderate your arrogance. The user made an offer. If you take responsibility for developers, keep in mind that you do not talk with children in the yard, but with adults. Respect the opinion of all!
Posts: 224
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
27
this was NOT a haughty tone, nor arrogance. Stop reading answers half-way. I was polite, not disrespectful and only said true things. I'm just tired to see how people can be (or seems to be) selfish with FREE software. My "grade" here does not have anything to do with my opinion (respect it too). So if want to express myself, I'll do it freely, without filters. Deal with it.
I didn't see where you offered your help, you only seem to explain to the developers how to do it right and how lame the latest revision was. If this was not your goal, then I'm sorry for this misunderstanding. There is already beta release(s), but a lot of people were pushing CB team to release a new revision quickly. Now we can see that speed is not compatible with quality.
Posts: 182
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2017
(02-17-2018, 01:34 PM)badablek Wrote: this was NOT a haughty tone, nor arrogance. Stop reading answers half-way. I was polite, not disrespectful and only said true things. I'm just tired to see how people can be (or seems to be) selfish with FREE software. My "grade" here does not have anything to do with my opinion (respect it too). So if want to express myself, I'll do it freely, without filters. Deal with it.
I didn't see where you offered your help, you only seem to explain to the developers how to do it right and how lame the latest revision was. If this was not your goal, then I'm sorry for this misunderstanding. There is already beta release(s), but a lot of people were pushing CB team to release a new revision quickly. Now we can see that speed is not compatible with quality.
To help in beta testing is what? If you have no opportunity to contain testers, then why the refusal follows? Users want to render the feasible help, and you rest a horn and you say that we are fine. Microsoft uses services of testers in free of charge in Winfows 10 what prevents to adopt experience? And what you repeat all the time that the browser free? Now almost all browsers are free. It is possible to tell that developers have to tell thanks to users, for the fact that use Cent and create subjects about the browser in the countries, promote advance of the browser. Where will you get to from all this? If you don't want, then it is possible to water with shit, bugs in 63, 64 will be confirmation that from Chinese you shouldn't wait for anything good.
Russians can switch-off the filter too and impose you with our mat. Behave decently and to you will be also belongs.
Nobody hurries the team of developers. Users want clarity when the new version is released. Chrome, Firefox have a schedule, could give the though approximate with dispersion in several days. And the question with the requirement of updates would disappear at once. Normal users don't hurry, they want versions with the minimum quantity of mistakes.
Posts: 61
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation:
5
02-18-2018, 06:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2018, 06:45 AM by ClubMember.)
(02-17-2018, 01:34 PM)badablek Wrote: you only seem to explain to the developers how to do it right and how lame the latest revision was ? You obviously mixed me up with someone. "Selfishly with FREE software", you distort, on the contrary, we are grateful and understand the possible problems. Nobody demands anything, in my opinion, the forum is an opportunity to discuss something, to exchange opinions ... I always thought so, but now it's impossible to speak freely, you can get blame for a simple offer of help.
Posts: 224
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
27
again, and this is the my last reply in this thread : IT WAS NOT OBVIOUS THAT YOU WERE OFFERING YOUR HELP IN BETA TESTING. I can't be clearer that that !
I didn't say you ARE selfish, but you SEEM TO. Can't you see the nuance in my words ?
AND I DID NOT REFUSE YOUR HELP, I AM NOT EVEN PART OF CENTBROWSER TEAM !!! (and of course I will never speak for them !)
Last but not least I'm gonna quote myself and highlight the most important part that you missed :
Quote:I didn't see where you offered your help, you only seem to explain to the developers how to do it right and how lame the latest revision was. If this was not your goal, then I'm sorry for this misunderstanding
SEEM TO
def : Give the impression of being something or having a particular quality.
SORRY
def: Used to express apology.
End of drama.
Posts: 6,176
Threads: 90
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
365
Sorry for the inconvenience.
This time We release In a hurry because of the Site Per Process issue and another crash issue. Unluckily the time was near by Chinese Spring festival. So it was released without enough testing, But it won't be general case.
|
