The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.13 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CentBrowser Forum
Need your opinion for the portable version - Printable Version

+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Members Area (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Discuss (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Need your opinion for the portable version (/showthread.php?tid=19)

Pages: 1 2 3

Need your opinion for the portable version - Admini - 07-06-2015

We are improving user experience of the portable version, but we are not decided on how the portable version should be.
Please give us your opinion.
1.the archive format: 7z, zip or self-extractor?
2.Should support auto upgrade?

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - xenon - 07-06-2015

No need portable version.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - reactor - 07-07-2015

self-extractor / auto upgrade

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - Admini - 07-08-2015

(07-07-2015, 02:10 PM)reactor Wrote: self-extractor / auto upgrade

We also prefer this way.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - DrWatson - 07-14-2015

We need a real portable version that stores profile with your folder, not fake portable, which is now. What we have now is simply 7-zip archived content of distribution package. Profile stored in system folder.

The browser is great, especially considering his youth. However, the absence of a normal portable version depressing.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - Admini - 07-14-2015

(07-14-2015, 06:20 PM)DrWatson Wrote: We need a real portable version that stores profile with your folder, not fake portable, which is now. What we have now is simply 7-zip archived content of distribution package. Profile stored in system folder.

The browser is great, especially considering his youth. However, the absence of a normal portable version depressing.

Thanks for suggestion.This issue has been solved in the new version.Th new portable version will differ from normal version at binary level.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - Admini - 07-14-2015

(07-14-2015, 06:20 PM)DrWatson Wrote: We need a real portable version that stores profile with your folder, not fake portable, which is now. What we have now is simply 7-zip archived content of distribution package. Profile stored in system folder.

The browser is great, especially considering his youth. However, the absence of a normal portable version depressing.

As a temporary solution, you can add the --user-data-dir flag to the shortcut, like this: centbrowser.exe --user-data-dir=c:\foo

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - DrWatson - 07-19-2015

Thank you for new portable. Now it works fine.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - Admini - 07-19-2015

(07-19-2015, 05:52 PM)DrWatson Wrote: Thank you for new portable. Now it works fine.

Thanks for your promotion, as well as Cento8, jasonliu, etc.

RE: Need your opinion for the portable version - quanghau - 09-30-2015

let doing a version have. .apk. give android and. share in. play store or CH play give everyone user

I very thank