STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354

The following warnings occurred:

Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.13 (Linux)

File	Line	Function
/inc/class_error.php	153	errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code	2	errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php	287	eval
/printthread.php	117	printthread_multipage

STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Printable Version

+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 (/showthread.php?tid=4927)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Admini - 12-02-2023

(11-30-2023, 08:39 PM)Denaru Wrote: It feels like smooth-scrolling makes little difference relative to the mouse.
I turned it off/on in both Cent and Chrome, no change.
Safe mode in Cent feels like it makes the mouse more responsive, but I can't use it all the time(.

I'd like to understand the reason for the change in mouse feel, how the mouse feels so light in regular Chrome, but in Cent it feels heavier.

If there is no problem in safe mode, the problem may be some extension or hardware acceleration.
You can also try upgrading the hardware drivers firstly.

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Admini - 12-02-2023

(12-01-2023, 07:53 PM)ray88ra Wrote: for me, Thorium works significantly faster than other browsers on Windows, Linux and Android
So I asked if it was possible to use the best practices of this browser to improve speed.
After all, in terms of convenience, Cent is still the best

Thanks for your support.

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Admini - 12-02-2023

(12-01-2023, 10:15 AM)ray88ra Wrote: https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.1/

compare

https://i.ibb.co/RCqT3ZD/17031456bdc3.jpg

Changing compilation parameters can indeed affect performance, but sometimes there may be side effects.
Have you experienced any stability issues in Thorium?

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - lokosta - 12-03-2023

(12-02-2023, 04:12 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Changing compilation parameters can indeed affect performance, but sometimes there may be side effects.
Have you experienced any stability issues in Thorium?

Thorium is faster than cent, but only because it has not been updated for a long time (102 vs 117).
Thorium is faster than stock chromium, but slower than any popular browser (chrome,opera,edge)

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - QZMTCH - 12-03-2023

(12-03-2023, 05:23 AM)lokosta Wrote: Thorium is faster than cent, but only because it has not been updated for a long time (102 vs 117).
Thorium is faster than stock chromium, but slower than any popular browser (chrome,opera,edge)

https://chromium.woolyss.com/#browser-benchmark
the speedometer just reproduces the same repeated actions with the DOM, check other tests as well
but these tests must be checked on new chromium engine
and you are checking old cent vs browsers that have new engines, with new Javascript standards, this is not correct

for example, in some moments the cent is better, and in some moments it’s supermium on the 117 engine
cent 102
https://i.imgur.com/zr9XXCm.png

supermium 118 (By the way, 119 has already been released 1 hour ago)
https://i.imgur.com/KGp9teh.png

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Maximus Panin - 12-03-2023

(12-03-2023, 05:23 AM)lokosta Wrote:

Strange test. iPhone 14 Pro Max

[Image: 8df13887-c70d-4375-acfa-5859a26be4b3-jpeg.288100]

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - lokosta - 12-04-2023

(12-03-2023, 05:10 PM)QZMTCH Wrote: https://chromium.woolyss.com/#browser-benchmark
the speedometer just reproduces the same repeated actions with the DOM, check other tests as well
but these tests must be checked on new chromium engine
and you are checking old cent vs browsers that have new engines, with new Javascript standards, this is not correct

for example, in some moments the cent is better, and in some moments it’s supermium on the 117 engine
cent 102
https://i.imgur.com/zr9XXCm.png

supermium 118 (By the way, 119 has already been released 1 hour ago)
https://i.imgur.com/KGp9teh.png

Who is talking about superium, we are talking about thorium. Read the topic carefully.
In any tests, cent is slower than others today, with the exception of basic chromium. The engine has not been updated for too long.
Of course, after the update, it will take the place of fast browsers. I hope that's the case.

(12-03-2023, 10:33 PM)Maximus Panin Wrote: Strange test. iPhone 14 Pro Max

There is nothing strange. The test shows the performance depending on your hardware.

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - sefiqin - 12-04-2023

Convenience and customizability are important to me in Cent. What do these speedometers affect - YouTube videos with a lower resolution or you are going to run Cyberpunk 2077 in the browser and the frame rate is not enough? Let's not load the developer with unnecessary nonsense.

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - Admini - 12-04-2023

(12-03-2023, 05:23 AM)lokosta Wrote: Thorium is faster than cent, but only because it has not been updated for a long time (102 vs 117).
Thorium is faster than stock chromium, but slower than any popular browser (chrome,opera,edge)

Is the stock chromium official build?
Intuitively stock chromium should be the fastest because it is the least bloated.

RE: STABLE version -- 5.0.1002.354 - lokosta - 12-05-2023

(12-04-2023, 04:11 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Is the stock chromium official build?
Intuitively stock chromium should be the fastest because it is the least bloated.

Yes, I downloaded it from here: Chromium