+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released (/showthread.php?tid=1393)
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-28-2017
(05-28-2017, 03:15 PM)Fighter4Freedom Wrote: I don't want to use port. ver.
Please try reinstalling your Visual C++ Redistributable from here:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - rey - 05-28-2017
em.. still no way to install extentions =| "Download interrupted" while trying to install any extention. using portable version.
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-28-2017
(05-28-2017, 03:50 PM)rey Wrote: em.. still no way to install extentions =| "Download interrupted" while trying to install any extention. using portable version.
Please check your anti-virus and firewall first.
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - badablek - 05-28-2017
(05-28-2017, 10:14 AM)CentBrowser Wrote: Is this feature so important?
We feel that where to display the extension icons is not a big deal.
for me (at least), It is, more than you think
I'm using extensions that work in the background (smoothscrollerator, anti-adblock killer, etc.) or that are designed only for one website (like ebay, leboncoin, etc.) and I don't want to see useless icons in the main interface or in the main menu which have to stay cristal clear and show only USEFUL icons because we have sometimes to disable it (adblock) or because we have to see it everytime (downloads)
everything else is useless 99% of the time, then why showing them ? Even hidden, the way that MD works is stupid IMHO
MD was made to make a clean interface, chrome/chromium developers are doing exactly the opposite...and it seems nobody cares. When MD was enforced, I did'nt care because I had the command-line to avoid that lame feature...now we don't even have the choice.
The good way to make a universal and popular web browser, IMHO, can be resumed with one word : CHOICE. Let people CHOOSE to use or not features. CB is great because we can tweak it and enable/disable what we want/don't want (like mouse gestures, for example). Removing this ability will lead to have x forks of chrome/chromium with exactly the same interface and with no "soul"...
Question is : is it hard to keep that feature alive so users can CHOOSE to use or not this interface. I'm not a programmer, but I don't think that this feature, which only tweaks a little bit the interface, represents a lot of source code, am I wrong ?
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - jack - 05-28-2017
(05-28-2017, 03:50 PM)rey Wrote: em.. still no way to install extentions =| "Download interrupted" while trying to install any extention. using portable version.
https://www.centbrowser.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1451&pid=6354#pid6354
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - rey - 05-28-2017
(05-28-2017, 05:30 PM)jack Wrote: https://www.centbrowser.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1451&pid=6354#pid6354
thank you! this worked. damn, i though it was about version of Chromium and was waiting for a week till Cent update, thinking that it will solve extention problem
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-29-2017
(05-28-2017, 04:48 PM)badablek Wrote: for me (at least), It is, more than you think
I'm using extensions that work in the background (smoothscrollerator, anti-adblock killer, etc.) or that are designed only for one website (like ebay, leboncoin, etc.) and I don't want to see useless icons in the main interface or in the main menu which have to stay cristal clear and show only USEFUL icons because we have sometimes to disable it (adblock) or because we have to see it everytime (downloads)
everything else is useless 99% of the time, then why showing them ? Even hidden, the way that MD works is stupid IMHO
MD was made to make a clean interface, chrome/chromium developers are doing exactly the opposite...and it seems nobody cares. When MD was enforced, I did'nt care because I had the command-line to avoid that lame feature...now we don't even have the choice.
The good way to make a universal and popular web browser, IMHO, can be resumed with one word : CHOICE. Let people CHOOSE to use or not features. CB is great because we can tweak it and enable/disable what we want/don't want (like mouse gestures, for example). Removing this ability will lead to have x forks of chrome/chromium with exactly the same interface and with no "soul"...
Question is : is it hard to keep that feature alive so users can CHOOSE to use or not this interface. I'm not a programmer, but I don't think that this feature, which only tweaks a little bit the interface, represents a lot of source code, am I wrong ?
About 50 files were changed in extension_action_redesign removal.
We can add it back, but the obstacle is that Chrome developers are replacing the extension interface chrome.pageAction(which the flag extension_action_redesign relies on) with chrome.browserAction.
So the extension developers will also follow Chrome step and change their extensions.
Once we add it back, it is only useful for old extensions.
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - RDS - 05-29-2017
(05-29-2017, 12:33 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: About 50 files were changed in extension_action_redesign removal.
We can add it back, but the obstacle is that Chrome developers are replacing the extension interface chrome.pageAction(which the flag extension_action_redesign relies on) with chrome.browserAction.
So the extension developers will also follow Chrome step and change their extensions.
Once we add it back, it is only useful for old extensions.
In the Opera 45 (Chrome 58) everything is fine with the extensions that appear in the address bar.
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - Oliver. - 05-30-2017
Hello
What about this request https://www.centbrowser.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1313&pid=5662#pid5662
RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-30-2017
(05-30-2017, 02:46 PM)Oliver. Wrote: Hello
What about this request https://www.centbrowser.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1313&pid=5662#pid5662
When opening foreground tabs from any sources, our principle is always replacing a new tab priorly.
And there is no option to change this behavior, not only for external links, but for all sources.