The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.13 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CentBrowser Forum
Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released - Printable Version

+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Cent Browser 2.6.5.52(for Windows) Released (/showthread.php?tid=1393)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - RDS - 05-26-2017

CentBrowser
How in the new version to return the icons of some extensions to the address bar?
Screen:
v 2.5.6.57 (64-bit) (portable)
[Image: uuYpgwp.jpg]
v 2.6.5.49 (64-bit) (portable)
[Image: SneetUS.jpg]

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Fighter4Freedom - 05-27-2017

Hi! Tell me please, how I can correctly update x32 ver. to x64 ver. cent? Because an error has appear after install x64 ver. atop x32 ver.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-27-2017

(05-26-2017, 06:14 PM)dinata Wrote: Thanks for this one.
[Bug fixes]--user-data-dir has no effect in startup command line
No more extension installation issue with this build.

So far no performance regression on this non PGO build.
Btw, is there any chance for Cent 64-bit WPO build on future release?

Thank you, we will look into WPO build.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-27-2017

(05-26-2017, 10:33 PM)RDS Wrote: CentBrowser
How in the new version to return the icons of some extensions to the address bar?
Screen:
v 2.5.6.57 (64-bit) (portable)
[Image: uuYpgwp.jpg]
v 2.6.5.49 (64-bit) (portable)
[Image: SneetUS.jpg]

Sorry the related code was removed from Chromium codebase, so the command line --extension-action-redesign=0 has no effect now.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-27-2017

(05-27-2017, 11:12 AM)Fighter4Freedom Wrote: Hi! Tell me please, how I can correctly update x32 ver. to x64 ver. cent? Because an error has appear after install x64 ver. atop x32 ver.

Try deleting these two registry item and install again:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\CentBrowser
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\CentBrowser

Please remember the location of your User Data directory.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - badablek - 05-28-2017

(05-27-2017, 04:29 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Sorry the related code was removed from Chromium codebase, so the command line --extension-action-redesign=0 has no effect now.

Does it mean that CB will never be able to use the command line "--extension-action-redesign=0" again ?

Hope not, or I will need to find another browser or stick on an old build, because all those icons in the main interface are stupid : when an extension is made for ONE website, why the hell would we overload the interface with an icon that will be used 1% of the time ?

Now imagine with 10 extensions, specifically designed for one site...And I didn't even counter all the other "general" extensions (adblock, smoothscrollerator, anti-adblock killer, etc.)

I really really don't understand chrome/chromium developers's point of view with this shitty Material Design and this obsession to overload a clean interface with dozen of unwanted and useless icons. ps : Hiding those icons in the main menu is not a good answer nor a good solution !


I really hope that you will take in consideration those who don't want unwanted icons in front of view  Sad

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-28-2017

(05-28-2017, 09:40 AM)badablek Wrote: Does it mean that CB will never be able to use the command line "--extension-action-redesign=0" again ?

Hope not, or I will need to find another browser or stick on an old build, because all those icons in the main interface are stupid : when an extension is made for ONE website, why the hell would we overload the interface with an icon that will be used 1% of the time ?

Now imagine with 10 extensions, specifically designed for one site...And I didn't even counter all the other "general" extensions (adblock, smoothscrollerator, anti-adblock killer, etc.)

I really really don't understand chrome/chromium developers's point of view with this shitty Material Design and this obsession to overload a clean interface with dozen of unwanted and useless icons. ps : Hiding those icons in the main menu is not a good answer nor a good solution !


I really hope that you will take in consideration those who don't want unwanted icons in front of view  Sad

Is this feature so important?
We feel that where to display the extension icons is not a big deal.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Fighter4Freedom - 05-28-2017

(05-27-2017, 04:31 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Try deleting these two registry item and install again:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\CentBrowser
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\CentBrowser

Please remember the location of your User Data directory.

I did it, but after try to run cent an error has appear...

   

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Admini - 05-28-2017

(05-28-2017, 12:53 PM)Fighter4Freedom Wrote: I did it, but after try to run cent an error has appear...

please try portable version.

RE: Cent Browser 2.6.5.49(for Windows) Released - Fighter4Freedom - 05-28-2017

(05-28-2017, 02:47 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: please try portable version.

I don't want to use port. ver.