+- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en)
+-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: beta version (5.1.1130.26) (/showthread.php?tid=6605)
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - Cyanide - 03-25-2024
(03-24-2024, 09:25 AM)QZMTCH Wrote: I don't think you understood anything
What does Yandex and Yandex browser have to do with it? where did you get the idea that they add something that only works in the Yandex browser? what nonsense?
we are only talking about chrome, about the old and new versions
and on older versions sites are not displayed correctly
if you don't understand this, then stop writing this crap
seriously?
Everywhere on all forums, and here too, many people expressed the same opinion (you just don’t see it). They all went to other browsers, but I didn’t (and not only me).
There is also a Chinese forum. Every second person there wrote it and continues to write it. And they migrate to Chrome and other browsers due to the fact that sites are not displayed as they should
The only site that you mentioned as an example of incorrect display was Yandex, and this is your example (if you suddenly have problems not only with understanding, but also with memory - link).
So, the question is why Yandex, no matter what are they guided by, should use questionable solutions that have stopped working correctly on outdated (and not so old) versions of browsers. And why should the developers chase after these quirks, where's the line of it?
Regarding beliefs - people share their opinions, someone switches browsers, but you're really trying to prove something to me. I'm telling you that you're wrong and there are specific reasons for that. You either can't understand or translate those reasons to Russian, so you keep repeating the same thing for 10 times. But I've already said it (and I say it again) - it's not worth arguing more, I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, we've all heard the arguments, and now we should leave them to Cent Browser developer. I didn't say in any of my messages, that you're the only one with that opinion. There are lots of people who think that way, but I don't agree with this point of view, no matter who else thinking the same and how many of them. If you still don't get it - just read our conversation again and again.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - asasaw22 - 03-25-2024
heyyy
(03-24-2024, 07:23 PM)asasaw22 Wrote: Hello, when will the stable version be released?heeey
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - Sitego - 03-25-2024
It doesn't work: "Inherit the session of a multi-login tab, when opening a new tab from it".
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - Admini - 03-25-2024
(03-25-2024, 01:25 PM)Sitego Wrote: It doesn't work: "Inherit the session of a multi-login tab, when opening a new tab from it".This is a bug that we have confirmed.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - QZMTCH - 03-25-2024
(03-25-2024, 01:06 AM)Cyanide Wrote: So, the question is why Yandex, no matter what are they guided by, should use questionable solutions that have stopped working correctly on outdated (and not so old) versions of browsers. And why should the developers chase after these quirks, where's the line of it?you are silly? what does Yandex have to do with it? There are many such sites where developers add new JS and CSS functions from new versions of Chromium. If this is difficult for you to understand, then stop writing the same thing for several pages. Just pass by.
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5794378545102848 even this is not in version 102 cent, and it’s been two years since they started adding everything to the sites
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5705698193178624 https://chromestatus.com/feature/5768400507764736 not even that
and you tell me why chase after these quirks?
https://chromiumchecker.com/ open the page and see how much has been added even since version 118
https://chromestatus.com/features and it’s even better to immediately see here how many other things will be fixed in addition to adding a new one
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - Cyanide - 03-25-2024
(03-25-2024, 04:14 PM)QZMTCH Wrote: There are many such sites where developers add new JS and CSS functions from new versions of Chromium.Buy a new translator if you really saw anywhere that I call Yandex the only site that uses it. I'm talking about Yandex as the only example you've given. If you have nothing better to do, well, show me at least 10 of them, if there are «many such sites». I'm sure it won't be a problem.
(03-25-2024, 04:14 PM)QZMTCH Wrote: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5794378545102848 even this is not in version 102 cent, and it’s been two years since they started adding everything to the sitesIt can't be! Unbelievable! How I used to live without these incredibly useful updates..
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5705698193178624 https://chromestatus.com/feature/5768400507764736 not even that
and you tell me why chase after these quirks?
https://chromiumchecker.com/ open the page and see how much has been added even since version 118
https://chromestatus.com/features and it’s even better to immediately see here how many other things will be fixed in addition to adding a new one
The trick is that these patchnotes were written for such easy-going weathervanes like you. On their own, they aren't authoritative, and neither are those site devs who headlong stuff their sites with useless "progressive" functionality.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - tamer - 03-25-2024
![[Image: 3GkjbjE.png8d-7d509f353e03]](https://i.imgur.com/3GkjbjE.png8d-7d509f353e03)
> even this is not in version 102 cent
Well, actually it's there, you might need just to enable it in the flags. There's not that much (like, nothing) we're missing. C'mon, we can't have the latest one, it's just impossible, deal with it or choose another browser.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - hth4nh - 03-26-2024
(03-17-2024, 03:53 PM)CentBrowser Wrote: Have you tested in safe mode of the browser?
Or have you disabled DirectWrite in normal mode?
I tried turning off DirectWrite, I think it made the font less weird. But it causes some other errors:
- The font in the tab bar becomes fragmented and odd.
- Characters in the "Code" tab in leetcode.com disappear randomly.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - piliq - 03-26-2024
(03-26-2024, 04:26 AM)hth4nh Wrote: I tried turning off DirectWrite, I think it made the font less weird. But it causes some other errors:You need to use --no-sandbox in Startup Command line (chrome://settings/cbOtherOptions)
- The font in the tab bar becomes fragmented and odd.
- Characters in the "Code" tab in leetcode.com disappear randomly.
RE: beta version (5.1.1130.26) - Admini - 03-26-2024
(03-26-2024, 04:26 AM)hth4nh Wrote: I tried turning off DirectWrite, I think it made the font less weird. But it causes some other errors:After disabling DirectWrite, have you tried disabling all extensions?
- The font in the tab bar becomes fragmented and odd.
- Characters in the "Code" tab in leetcode.com disappear randomly.
And you can try using it together with MacType.