The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.25 (Linux)
|
Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Printable Version +- CentBrowser Forum (https://www.centbrowser.net/en) +-- Forum: Product Related (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Release Channel (https://www.centbrowser.net/en/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released (/showthread.php?tid=1112) |
RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admini - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 05:48 PM)piliq Wrote: A bug with downloading. The name of temporary file is "Не подтвержден 535352.crdownload" in my case. v2.1.9.49. In stable it was normal, just like "centbrowser_2.1.9.50_x64_portable.exe.crdownload" Please download again, probably because it is not uploaded completely when you were downloading. RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - reactor - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 05:33 PM)CentBrowser Wrote:(10-02-2016, 07:43 AM)reactor Wrote: find-next (f3) does not work after find (ctrl-f) flow: ctrl-F: enter a search word F3 (search next) -> does not work no. Can't search for " .exe " with F3 but .jpg working interesting :/ RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - Admini - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 06:02 PM)reactor Wrote: no. Quite weird, sounds like some symptom of virus. RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - reactor - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 06:06 PM)CentBrowser Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:02 PM)reactor Wrote: no. no problem with Cent Browser 2.0.10.57 RE: Cent Browser 2.0.10.57(for Windows) Released - badablek - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 05:31 PM)CentBrowser Wrote:(10-02-2016, 08:40 AM)badablek Wrote: this would be awesome. Thanks for taking it into consideration, it will save time for all "material design" haters like me I don't think so ! material design adds useless icons in the menu/tool bar. I don't see the point in adding icons from extensions that work only in the background or for specific websites. For my part, I'm using :
Everything else adds options on specific websites and does NOT need at all to be in the toolbar/menu ! So, I'd like to know...what are the benefits to waste a wonderful user's interface with all those useless icons of extensions I don't need to be in front of my view ? (hiding it in the menu is NOT a good answer ! ) A good interface, IMHO, should be :
Material Design adds useless stuff and is really ugly (in my opinion, again). Graphic effects are really bad, with those animations like an android phone I really hope this will stay as an OPTION (users should choose by themselves). Something nice with you, CentBrowser team, is that you are listening your users, and this is exactly what we need in order to shape the best browser (so please, keep MD as an option ) |